This 14-point review of a GetFitMining review online is by leaders participating in MoveQuest Mining, whose earlier version was and is still functioning as GetFitMining.

The creator of both projects is Lynette Artin.

Someone named “Isah Jimoh” we are unable to find online, who describes himself as “Laptop Lifestyle Champion,” appears to be paid by a website:

to write things that don’t openly accuse many network marketing companies or crypto projects of wrongdoing, so much as, rather, imply wrongdoing.

Which gains a lot of internet traction, especially the popular network marketing projects and cryptocurrency projects. Where people considering participating google and find these fake “reviews.”

Our own GetFitMining Review is a short video here.

An unsophisticated reader of “Isah Jimoh’s” is dazed and confused, and has a negative impression of the company or project. Usually not noticing the lack of actual allegations, with clever wording.

But the writer avoids litigation likelihood by not outright stating the things he implies.

Let’s review 14 ways the “GetFitMining Review” has virtually everything wrong:

1. “Isah Jimoh” the “Laptop Lifestyle Champion” starts right out in the Intro saying it’s a crypto-staking opportunity. GetFitMining, and rebranded MoveQuest in beta launch on the AVAX blockchain, are a “move to earn” cryptocurrency opportunity. 

(Huge crypto projects such as Cardano and Etherium have prevailed against the SEC in court, and many crypto projects DO offer staking rewards).

MoveQuest (and GetFitMining, its first name on the Binance blockchain, currently in rebrand on AVAX) operates on Proof of Physical Activity, which are reported via dApp (decentralized app) for those who’ve completed their physical activity to share in the pool of over 2,500 tokens released daily.

Those MQT crypto tokens are deposited in each miner’s digital wallet, which no one has access to besides them. They can, at any time, sell them for stablecoins or fiat currencies.

2. In the “Overview”:

“Isah Jimoh” again vaguely disparages by calling it a “scheme” and says it’s “enticing individuals with promises of passive returns through a convoluted staking investment model.”

The opportunity is neither convoluted, nor passive:

You, the miner, earn tokens for actual exercise you do, as tracked by, for instance, the Apple Watch, synching via Apple Health to the Get Fit Mining (soon the MoveQuest) app.

You can cash your tokens out for dollars or other fiat currency, at any time.

Calling it “convoluted” seems to be the author’s way of sidestepping actual research on the project..

3. This author repeatedly refers to the crypto project as a “company,” with “ownership” and “executive team,” which shows a profound lack of awareness of the difference between decentralized crypto projects and corporations in the TradFi (traditional finance) space.

He may wish to study what crypto projects are, and why decentralization makes them not whatsoever a company—and MoveQuest is entirely decentralized.

And if he continues to accept writing assignments from this website that attacks crypto and MLM projects, he really should learn the difference.

The author is clearly unaware of the basics of blockchain, cryptocurrency, and tokenomics, which are beyond the scope of this rebuttal. But they are very important basic concepts.

4. Since he hasn’t done the research to establish the relationships, he vaguely refers to Shirley Lynette Artin Crawford (there’s a divorce in there, but he’s not done his homework on that or many other things)--

--anyway, he cannot seem to ascertain, despite that being easy, that she’s the creator of the project. He says she “emerges as a key figure,” and continues to wrongly refer to it as a “company.”

He then alludes to her “history in previous Ponzi schemes,” including Zeek Rewards – (that’s one company, not more than one, and while it wasn’t a Ponzi scheme, it eventually came to its demise, but Lynette Artin did not own this company nor was charged with any illegal activity).

Most of us have probably had some participation or interaction with a company that later failed. This does not in any way imply wrongdoing on the part of the distributor or networker or customer.

5. He says it’s a “red flag” that ownership is not on the website. If he understood even a little bit about crypto projects and decentralization, he’d know the beauty of it is a LACK of corporate ownership and control. 

However, the creator of the project and the lead developer do Zoom meetings, and various calls, constantly interacting with the growing community of thousands of crypto miners on the Avalanche blockchain.

6. Under his “Dubious Business Model” heading (a theme in his writing for this site), he says “resembling a pyramid scheme.”

This writer needs to familiarize himself with what a pyramid scheme is, because he clearly does not know.

People who haven’t bothered to research the two often conflate the trillion-dollar industry of direct sales / multi-level marketing with “pyramid schemes,” but the former is legal, and the latter is illegal.

And GetFit Mining and MoveQuest are neither. Not a multi-level marketing company. Not a pyramid scheme.

Notice that all these things he’s wrong on, he plays word games to imply, and smear, without directly alleging. (Which could get him named in a defamation lawsuit although he appears to operate outside the U.S.) (And he or they are not findable with the name he uses in this piece.)

The business model of the website he appears to have been hired by, outside the U.S., appears to be capturing traffic from hundreds of different network marketing and cryptocurrency companies and projects.

I did not study how driving traffic to the website monetizes for the site. But a common business strategy involves capturing traffic from often-searched terms, like all network marketing and crypto projects, and then monetizing the site in some way.

7. Under “Unrealistic ROI Guarantees” headline:

No specific return or compensation is guaranteed, besides what is in the smart contract—but when the participant cashes out in dollars (or their local currency), the amount they receive depends on the value of the MQT token at the time they sell.

If you have 10 tokens and the token is worth $10, you could cash out for $100, less fees.

But if you hold your tokens and the token is later worth $1,000 as the ecosystem grows, your 10 tokens are worth $10,000, less fees.

The project is encoded on the blockchain and runs on smart contracts. Again, beyond the scope of this article: but these are important topics this author should have learned about before making wide-ranging quasi-accusations.

He again falsely refers to it as staking, as he’s not taken the time to understand that with the highest-level miner, you can earn 400% rewards on your physical activity.

This isn’t staking, and it’s not in dollars. (It’s in tokens, which can be redeemed for stable coins, and  then fiat money, at which time it becomes a taxable event.)

You aren’t guaranteed a specific number of tokens, even if you max at 20,000 steps and 2 hours of exercise. You “mine”  a proportionate share of the approx 2,500 tokens released every day, based on your PoPA. (Again, Proof of Physical Activity.)

For instance, I own 8 Titan miners (the most available currently, and at the highest level), and I earn about 1 token per day. I do not cash them out for $10 or $30 or $65–or briefly the token was even at $125–because I take a longer-range view, and want to help build the ecosystem so that the MQT token is eventually worth $1,000 and higher, before I sell any.

(After all, the project adopted the tokenomics of Bitcoin, including a 21M maximum number of tokens. And 10 years ago, Bitcoin was at $80. Today, it’s at about $100,000.)

Fewer miners reporting Proof of Physical Activity (PoPA), means more tokens for miners who do. Lynette Artin could walk away, and not one more miner ever join, and this crypto project could carry on, forever.

But there’s another upside if more miners are reporting PoPA:

You may get fewer tokens, but the inflow of new miners drives the price of the token up.

(Wouldn’t you always rather have a smaller piece of a much bigger pie, than a big piece of a tiny pie?)

8. “Spelling and Formatting Errors” header:

Now we have gotten to the level of grasping at straws, making me wonder if this writer was paid by the word. But this accusation is ironic from someone who clearly doesn’t know what the terms mean he is using, like SEC, staking, “pyramid scheme,” company  vs crypto, guaranteed returns, etc.

9. “Lack of regulation and audit” header:

All the 10K’s of crypto projects all over the world are without regulatory clarity.

Perhaps this writer has just been told to take an anti-crypto slant on all cryptocurrency projects, to grab SEO and bring traffic to the site? Even though the entire world is moving toward the blockchain, one of the most  industry-disruptive forces, on par with AI, the computer, electricity, the wheel, and fire.

Cryptocurrencies are being adopted faster than cell phones and computer were.

A large bill passed the House in 2024, which was very supportive of crypto in the U.S., and the Senate had 70% support, but leaders of that legislative body chose not to hold a vote.

Regulatory clarity is missing, but the project was registered on July 22, 2024. Founder Lynette Artin says she intends, down the road, to pay the $100K’s for an independent audit of the smart contract and blockchain.

Meanwhile, the earliest adopters watch the transparent ledger every day and have seen nothing of concern.

10. “Compensation Plan” header:

The author again says the compensation “revolves around passive returns through staking … tokens” – again, it’s not passive, and it’s not staking.

No ”affiliates” (this is not an affiliate-model project either) are “promised ROIs of up to 25%” as “Isah Jimoh” claims.

He does say one true thing. Referral commissions are incentivized so that members are compensated for referring others, though we’re not sure why the word “scheme” keeps sneaking into the text.

11. Passive returns (staking): this gentleman, as “lite” as his research was, seems to be entirely referring to the GetFit Mining program, which is very much still in existence and paying miners, on the Binance blockchain.

But the author seems unaware that the owner has pre-launched a new-and-improved project called MoveQuest on the Avalanche chain … but then does give the rates for evolving miners, except that they’re all old numbers, or are just completely wrong.

12. This reviewer says the project pays out “staking returns” (again, that’s false, they pay tokens) in Tether, or USDT.

The entire article has completely ignored the Proof of Physical Activity, and insists on calling the crypto project a “company” and calling very active earning “passive.”

13. Regulatory Concerns and Securities Fraud—that’s a heavy allegation, which he avoids making directly. (It being false, so he doesn’t dare.) By making it a heading.

No one has accused or convicted MoveQuest of anything of the sort, besides him. He again refers to “staking” and says it meets the Howey Test, which it absolutely does not, so it is not subject to securities regulation.

The huge crypto projects Cardano and Ethereum have already prevailed on this topic. It is irresponsible and misleading to imply (readers will see it as a statement where it’s just an implication) that there is any SEC fraud going on here.

14. In “Conclusion” header:

This author refers to MoveQuest (GetFit Mining, its predecessor” as a “crypto MLM scheme,” which is “word salad,” both false and meaningless at the same time. “Scheme” implies wrongdoing, which is false.)

MLM is a business model that MoveQuest and GetFit Mining do not meet. And “crypto” is thrown in there, despite the author clearly not understanding what it is.

We hope this has been helpful.

We find MoveQuest developed by Lynette Artin and a team of blockchain developers and other professionals to be an exciting crypto project that attracted 5,200 miners in its first three months, before even a “hard launch.”

Over $40M has been paid out in just a few short months, and the token went from $1 to about $14 (with some spikes up to $125 as well, in its first three months).

Frankly, going from $1 to $3 in three months would have made this an incredibly successful blockchain project.

And, in just that three months, people are reporting losing 10 pounds, even 20 pounds, and enjoying doing fitness activities instead of passive activities, improving their health.

Our own GetFitMining Review is a short video laying out the project here.

–Published by MoveQuest miners